April 6, 2004


  • Father Hess, a priest who once cursed God for killing his wife, now tries to comfort his family about the errie alien lights appearing all over the world:


    "People break down into two groups when they experience something lucky. Group number one sees it as more than luck, more than coincidence. They see it as a sign, evidence, that there is someone up there, watching out for them.


    Group number two sees it as just pure luck. Just a happy turn of chance. I'm sure the people in Group number two are looking at those fourteen lights in a very suspicious way. For them, the situation is fifty-fifty. Could be bad, could be good. But deep down, they feel that whatever happens, they're on their own. And that fills them with fear.


    Yeah, there are those people. But there's a whole lot of people in Group number one. When they see those fourteen lights, they're looking at a miracle. And deep down, they feel that whatever's going to happen, there will be someone there to help them. And that fills them with hope.


    See what you have to ask yourself is what kind of person are you? Are you the kind that sees signs, sees miracles? Or do you believe that people just get lucky? Or, look at the question this way: Is it possible that there are no coincidences...?"


    Family:  "Wait, do you believe in what you just said, I thought you no longer believe in God?" 


    Hess:  "Are you comforted?"


    Family:  "Yes."


    Hess:  "Then be comforted.  It doesn't matter."


    Except that it did.  For later in the movie Night gave us a chain of events that deeply challenge his viewers to decide which group they are in.  Night did not cheat and did not tip the scales--my faith/agnosticism was tested, and I left the theater reborn.


    Signs is my favorite essay on faith, and it affected me spiritually far more than "Passions."  I am reminded of this movie by a fellow Xangian, who queried whether religion was merely a rationalization to provide comfort.  If so, are such comforts satisfying?


    This was not a "look at me, I'm growing up and questioning all establishments to be cool" type of question.  She meant it as a question applicable to her personally, and it was a hard (heck probably the hardest) one to answer.  I'm a born skeptic, and yet I envy the faithful and at times yearn to be counted among them.  However, no matter how hard I try, I cannot cast off my skepticism, and yes, sometimes that means I feel scared and lonely and isolated.  Like when I found out my mother was sick.  I burried myself in medical research and filling up forms, but I felt alone, and tired.


    But alas, I think there is a third group of people.  They might be ambivalent about faith in God, but not about faith in each other.  A universe without God is not a lonely universe.  If anything, it should make you cling on to your fellow men even more tightly, for we are all each other have.  Before you protest that friendship and family is not enough to fill that cosmic void, ask yourself this:  Why do you post on Xanga when you could have easily kept a private journal on your own computer?  Some say God hears all prayers but answers none, at least not in this life.  I don't know if HE is watching me.  I do know that when I read about your weirdly wonderful lives and share my own with you, I feel good, and I'm comforted.


    P.S.  Speaking of cling ons, allow me to geek out for a moment.    After a long hiatus, Deep Space Nine is finally back on cable TV!  Starting today, there is a DS9 marathon on Spike TV from Noon to 9 p.m. for the entire week.  I will infect you with my appreciation for this show slowly, like Chinese water torture.  For now, suffice it to say that any show with episode titles like these deserves your attention:  Emissary | Babel | In Purgatory's Shadow | Ties of Blood and Water | Wrongs Darker than Death or Night | Treachery, Faith, and the Great River.


               


     

Comments (17)

  • you aren't busy this weekend! haha how lucky :] so how are you mister lawyer ... ^_^ im going to go rent some of those movies you suggested .. :] hehe ! have a nice dayyyyy!!!

  • Gotta say DS9 is a poor poor fascimile of TNG. I think the problem is that the space station doesn't really go anywhere, so they're a little more limited in the plot lines.

  • i must agree with beats. the whole sense of adventure, of pioneering discovery.. is just missing from ds9. i think they realized this in an 'oh shit' studio moment and tried to get it back with voyager, but that was just a weak attempt at old glories to me. enterprise has had some moments, with the great premise of exploring the whole humanity before perfection shtick, but even that seemed to wear thin pretty quick.

    if you ask me, probably the best futuristic (ships and laser guns) sci-fi in recent times was farscape. if you've never watched it, you're missing out - the stories are wonderfully substantial, the characters far more than shallow cardboard cutouts.. hell even the special effects are pretty nifty.

    anyway, just another law school kid saying hi. drop me a line, i'm interested in how you're finding practice (three weeks until i'm done and i don't think i'm going to).

  • is that what "signs" is about?? i got this movie a while ago, but heard so many crackpot theories, i just lost interest in actually watching it. ok, i'll dig it out this weekend.

    i'm curious- what exactly about xanga journals comfort you? is it that it provides a quick and accessible means of socializing at your convenience? or is it the anonyminity so that you can jot down a few honest opinions without fear of judgement?

  • DS9 and Enterprise are very different shows, so I guess it is true that one is a poor "fascimile" of another.  I love them both, but I feel Enterprise is more of the Assimov type of Sci-Fi, where the focus is plot and pure intellectual mind aerobics.

    DS9, on the other hand, focuses on character development.  The crew does not have to explore new worlds, because the main theme is about exploring themselves.  Not necessarily a pure sci fi focus, but it is rewarding in a storytelling kind of way.

    I have to say that TNG had a much better series ending than DS9.  *spoiler*  The last scene was brilliant.  "The sky's the limit" Picard said, summing up GR's faith in the potential of man.  It is also the first time Picard sat down with his crew to play cards, showing that he has grown as a Captain, and as a person.

    Afterthefact, I've heard really nice things about Farscape and Babylon 5.  I can't wait to watch them someday.  Practice is tough, but rewarding to people who really enjoy it.  I think I will post one of those "a day in the life of a first year associate" things one of these days. 

    If you have the luxury not to practice (i.e. no student loans), then it is definitely worth it to explore other career options. 

  • Smile, did you ever tell me which movie it was that inspired you?  =)

    SL600, it comforts me to know that other people are dealing with the same questions about life.  It comforts me to read Smile's page, because I can share in her joy and anticipation of getting the hell out of school.  It is like reliving my childhood. =)

    I leave you with a quote from Roger Ebert:

    "These conversations can really only be held with strangers. We all need to talk about metaphysics, but those who know us well want details and specifics; strangers allow us to operate more vaguely on a cosmic scale"

  • oh its was this chinese drama called "innocently guilty", its really touching and good .. i like the cases and how she [the lawyer] handle them. and her motto was like .. she would like to help the innocent people and the poor, cause you know how rich people, they could always get away with things easily.. yea ... so, she was trying to help the poor people and everything, and she won all of her cases too because, so said something about she argued from the heart .. and she never lied .. [i don't think i make sense] haha ... but yeah. :]

  • Having a skeptic nature is such a burden sometimes. There are times in my life in which I feel the desire to be simple to the point of being ignorant, to have that devotion and comfort. But it's not in my nature, and no matter how I will try to ignore the pestering questions, I will succumb to my curiosity and realize that nothing is true other than what I believe in myself. So I will then make a fourth group, in which I I believe in a religion all of my own, based on my ideology and outlook on life infused with that of what I find pleasant in other religions and in other people. A bit biased yes, but comforting and open to the idea of questioning.

  • haha thanks for the display of restraint. on another note, i personally did not really like Signs. I felt it was trying to masquerade around as this "super scary thriller" when it really was just a movie to show the writers' far too hunky-dory view of religion and faith. i dont know.. i'm usually not so bitter about movies, but it just came together far too perfectly at the end.

  • Dude, for one thing, how'd you find out where was?

    Two, what's up?

    Three, I wish I knew how to make my site look like this, only like McDonald's.

  • I have issues with movies (although I watch them).  When you get right down to it, the actors, by their inflections, and the directors, by allowing things to vary from the screenplay, are only letting us see what they want us to know.  Give me a book (yes, I know they have editors) and I will interpret for myself.

  • Smile, I will add that on my Netflix list.  Sounds like an interesting movie.  I think you will like Rainmaker; it has the same idealism AND Matt Damon.  How can you go wrong?

    Tuesday, I like that group, sign me up.  I think in a way most religious people fit into your fourth group.  I have several Christian friends who only follow certain aspects of their church's teachings, like religion al la carte?

    Patty, I think the movie gave us a choice regarding religion.  *Spoilers*  The movie did not conclusively show us that God intervened to save Gibson's son.  That's ONE way to interpret it.  It could also be a complete coincidence.  A lot of people have asthma, and the warning from his dying wife could have been a random memory of her brother-in-law.  For me, the key is not whether God intervened, but rather the fact that Gibson chose to think that He did.  I personally think it was a coincidence, but I am glad that Gibson felt better for assigning a purpose to his wife's death.  He is comforted, and that counts for something.

    DrowScion, I looked up the xanga members on Hatrack.  Plus your link to Zotto gave it away.  Do you use a different name on the rack now?  I keep getting you confused with Eddie Whiteshoes when I was a lurker there.  As your alter ego once said, "I will be watching your career with great interest." 

    Procrastin8, books are more fun in the sense that you can do more of the interpretations yourself.  But movies are fun also because you can see other people's point of view.  Except when that point of view involves rewriting Faramir's character, then that is just wrong.

  • Ever notice that when you open your mind to the literary genre, watching someone else's ideas on the work are never up to your standard?

  • great and entertaining entries!

  • I'm completely ignorant and self-absorbed, so I haven't been able to read your entries all the way through...I apologize for this...

    But I can answer a question! Why didn't you meet more girls like me in high school? I'm sure you did, but didn't know it! Girls are closet perverts! All of us! We watch porn, and do dirty things! But we're obsessed with upholding the "allure" of being female---that means we lie about our purity.

  • you've been pretty busy lately ... haven't been blogging!

  • Procrastin8, most movies do not do the book justice.  There are exceptions though.  I think Shawshank Redemption, About a Boy, and High Fidelity all came pretty close to the spirit of those books as I understood them.

    Daff, I, for one, suck at manuvering cars around LA.  =)

    Angel, I always suspected that, now I have proof, although a decade too late.

    Smile, why haven't YOU been blogging?  Oh yes, that's right, too busy ditching school and having fun.  In that case, I forgive you.

Comments are closed.

Post a Comment

Recent Posts

Categories